How to avoid double taxation: strategies for global enterprises

Double taxation means that the same income is taxed twice by different jurisdictions, which erodes profits, limits growth, and increases operational and tax complexities for multinational organizations. Given the negative impact on financial planning and growth, international businesses need to take measures to avoid double taxation.

This blog post dives deep into the complex subject of double taxation for global enterprises, highlights different strategies to prevent double taxation, and provides an overview of different legal frameworks businesses need to adhere to when managing international corporate taxation.

Double taxation means that the same income is taxed twice by two or more different jurisdictions. This usually affects multinational companies with operations, subsidiaries, or investments across various countries.

There are two different types of double taxation:

• Economic double taxation: This occurs when the same economic activity or profit is taxed multiple times at different levels within the enterprise. For instance, profits distributed as dividends from a foreign subsidiary to the parent company may face taxes first on the subsidiary's earnings and again when distributed as dividends.

• Juridical double taxation: This happens when a company's income is taxed in the country where it was earned (i.e. the source country) and again in the company's home country (i.e. the residence country). For example, profits earned by a U.S.-based company's subsidiary in Germany may be taxed by both German and U.S. tax authorities.

There are several key triggers that often lead to double taxation for global enterprises. These triggers include sources of income such as:

• Foreign branch profits: When a multinational corporation earns profits through a branch in a foreign country, those profits are often taxed by the host country. If the company's home country also taxes the branch profits without providing tax relief, double taxation occurs.

• International intercompany dividends: When a subsidiary of a multinational company earns profits and distributes them as dividends to its parent company in another country, the profits may be taxed twice. First, the subsidiary’s profits are taxed locally, and then the dividends may be taxed again when received by the parent company.

• Royalties and licensing fees: Income from intellectual property, patents, or technology licensed to foreign subsidiaries may also face double taxation. The local country may impose withholding taxes on royalties, while the parent company’s country could tax the same income as part of its global income.

Understanding the different causes of double taxation is the first step for multinational organizations towards mitigating the risks and reducing the potential financial impact.

Double taxation example

Let’s consider the following example to gain a better understanding of the concept of double taxation. The subsidiary of a U.S.-based multinational corporation earns profits in Germany, which are taxed by the German government. When repatriating these profits to the U.S. as dividends, the organization might have to pay corporate income tax to the U.S. tax authorities as well, despite having already been taxed in Germany.

Without tax relief mechanisms like foreign tax credits or double tax treaties, this creates a double tax burden on the same income, reduces the company's net profit, and complicates financial planning.

Double taxation is a significant issue for global businesses because it increases the overall tax burden, reduces profitability, and creates compliance complexities. Here is an overview of the different financial, operational, and compliance-related risks associated with double taxation.

Financial impact of double taxation

• Direct financial costs: The most immediate financial impact of double taxation is the reduction in profitability. When profits are taxed multiple times across jurisdictions, a company’s overall tax burden increases significantly, reducing net income and cash flow.

• Increased cost of capital: Double taxation also indirectly raises the cost of capital. With reduced profits, companies may struggle to maintain strong credit standings which makes borrowing money more expensive.

• Reduced ability to invest in new markets: When tax costs reduce profits, organizations have less capital to allocate towards expanding into new geographies. Double taxation effectively raises the operational costs of foreign ventures which makes it harder for multinational enterprises to compete globally.

Operational and compliance implications of double taxation

• Increased compliance burden across geographies: Operating in multiple countries requires compliance with diverse and often conflicting tax regulations. Multinational corporations face a significant compliance burden as they must navigate and interpret the tax codes of each jurisdiction in which they operate. Double taxation issues complicate international taxation even further.

• Legal risks and penalties: Non-compliance with tax regulations can result in serious legal and financial consequences. Double taxation often makes compliance more challenging, as companies may struggle to accurately allocate income, expenses, and credits across borders. Mistakes in tax filings or misunderstandings about which jurisdiction has the right to tax certain income can lead to fines, audits, and reputational damage.

• Higher level of complexity in international taxation: Double taxation significantly increases the complexity of tax reporting. Companies must often prepare detailed records to support claims for tax relief, such as foreign tax credits or deductions, and to comply with international transfer pricing regulations. For multinational enterprises, ensuring compliance across different tax authorities becomes a highly specialized and resource-intensive task.

To address the risks and challenges described above, enterprises can implement different strategies, such as leveraging double tax treaties, using foreign tax credits, and developing efficient transfer pricing policies. Let’s look at the different ways to avoid double taxation through structured tax planning and strategic use of tax treaties.

Leveraging tax treaties to avoid double taxation

Double tax treaties are agreements between two countries that outline how income earned by residents of one country will be taxed in the other country. These treaties aim to reduce or eliminate double taxation by clearly defining each country's tax rights and offering tax relief mechanisms. Common provisions include reduced withholding tax rates on dividends, interest, and royalties, which lowers the tax burden on cross-border payments.

They also often define permanent establishment (PE) criteria, determining when a foreign entity is subject to tax in the other country. Many treaties even exempt certain income types from taxation in one jurisdiction to avoid overlap. To leverage these treaties effectively, companies should research specific provisions applicable to each jurisdiction they operate in, as treaty terms vary widely.

Lano Blog

Permanent establishment: what it is and how you can avoid it

Read more

Claiming foreign tax credits to avoid double taxation

Foreign tax credits (short: FTCs) allow multinational companies to offset the taxes they paid in a foreign country against taxes owed in their home country in order to avoid double taxation. For instance, if a U.S.-based company pays corporate tax on profits earned in France, it can claim a foreign tax credit to reduce its U.S. tax liability on that income.

This credit is calculated based on the actual amount of foreign tax paid and helps ensure that a company isn’t taxed twice on the same income. To leverage the full potential of FTCs, organizations should keep detailed records of foreign tax payments and work with international tax advisors to ensure credits are fully utilized under complex international taxation rules.

Avoiding double taxation through tax exemptions and deductions

In some countries, certain types of foreign income (e.g. dividends received from foreign subsidiaries) are exempt from domestic taxation, which allows companies to largely avoid double taxation. These exemptions are valuable for multinational companies with substantial foreign revenue, as they significantly reduce the overall tax burden and simplify cross-border tax compliance.

Using holding companies to avoid double taxation

Establishing holding companies in favorable tax jurisdictions (i.e. low- or zero-tax jurisdictions) allows multinational organizations to structure their global operations in a tax-efficient manner and reduce exposure to double taxation. By routing profits or dividends through these holding companies, global enterprises can benefit from favorable tax rates or exemptions on foreign-sourced income before repatriating profits to the parent company.

Transfer pricing to avoid double taxation

Transfer pricing refers to the prices charged between related entities (such as a parent company and its subsidiary) for goods, services, or intellectual property. For multinational corporations, setting appropriate transfer prices is essential, as it affects how profits are allocated across jurisdictions and thus how much tax is owed in each country.

A well-structured transfer pricing strategy can minimize double taxation by ensuring that profits are taxed in a way that creates value for the organization—always in compliance with local tax laws. Many countries require transfer pricing documentation to prevent tax evasion, so companies should work with tax experts to develop a compliant transfer pricing policy that meets both operational needs and regulatory requirements.

By implementing these strategies, global enterprises can effectively mitigate the risks and financial burdens associated with double taxation, ensuring a more efficient, tax-optimized global structure.

These strategies provide a solid foundation for managing double taxation risks. Here’s a list of additional practical tips to help you remain compliant while optimizing your tax obligations across jurisdictions.

• Get advice from international tax experts to ensure compliance and optimize tax strategies.

• Stay up to date with international tax legislation to anticipate changes and adjust tax planning accordingly.

• Maintain detailed documentation of income allocation, foreign taxes paid, and compliance steps taken to support tax claims and credits.

• Regularly review your corporate structure to assess whether your global set-up is optimized for tax efficiency.

• Develop cross-border tax compliance protocols to manage reporting requirements and reduce errors.

• Make strategic tax planning a priority and conduct a thorough tax analysis before expanding into new markets.

When implementing strategies to avoid double taxation, global enterprises must adhere to different global standards that govern cross-border taxation. Here is an overview of relevant international taxation frameworks multinationals should be familiar with in order to remain compliant.

OECD Model Tax Convention

The OECD Model Tax Convention serves as a blueprint for bilateral tax treaties worldwide. It establishes principles and guidelines to prevent double taxation and tax evasion by providing clear rules on taxing income and capital across borders. The OECD framework addresses and clarifies aspects like permanent establishment, allocation of taxing rights between residence and source countries, and transfer pricing standards to ensure fair profit distribution.

For global businesses, the OECD Model Tax Convention is crucial as it standardizes treaty terms and allows them to plan tax strategies consistently across jurisdictions while reducing the risk of double taxation.

OECD Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Framework

The Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Framework (short: BEPS Framework) is a joint project by the OECD and G20 which aims to address tax avoidance strategies that exploit gaps and mismatches in tax rules (known as base erosion and profit shifting). Key components include measures on transfer pricing, hybrid mismatch arrangements, controlled foreign company (CFC) rules, and country-by-country reporting requirements.

The BEPS framework encourages transparency, limits artificial profit shifting, and is designed to align taxation with economic activity. Adhering to BEPS regulations is critical for global enterprises to avoid penalties for non-compliance and prevent tax planning pitfalls that could lead to double taxation.

Global Anti-Base Erosion Model Rules 

The Global Anti-Base Erosion Model Rules (short: GloBE Rules) are part of the OECD’s Pillar Two initiative and introduce a global minimum tax rate for multinational corporations to prevent profit shifting to low-tax jurisdictions. The GloBE Rules are highly relevant for multinational enterprises as they add an additional layer of compliance and limit tax benefits in low-tax jurisdictions, which helps to prevent double taxation complexities and improve tax equity across countries.

United Nations Model Double Taxation Convention

The United Nations Model Double Taxation Convention is tailored for tax treaties between developed and developing countries, with an emphasis on source-country taxation. Compared to the OECD model, it gives more taxing rights to the country where income is generated rather than where the taxpayer resides.

This model includes provisions for withholding taxes on dividends, interest, and royalties, often at rates higher than those suggested by the OECD. For multinational corporations, this model is important when working in developing nations, as it influences the tax obligations and planning needed to avoid double taxation in these jurisdictions.

European Union Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive

The EU Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (ATAD) outlines mandatory anti-tax avoidance rules for EU member states in alignment with the OECD's BEPS framework. Core components include limitations on interest deductions, rules for taxing controlled foreign companies, hybrid mismatches, and exit taxation.

The directive also imposes anti-abuse rules to prevent tax avoidance schemes within the EU. For multinational corporations operating within the EU, ATAD compliance helps streamline tax practices and avoid double taxation, as non-compliance can result in double taxation penalties across multiple EU jurisdictions.